言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版)
嗨！
您正在找 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版) 這本書嗎？
這本 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版) 在博客來就可以買的到!
而且在博客來訂購 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版) 還享有優惠價唷!
還有博客來會不定期的舉辦一些如購物金贈送或是使用折價券折抵的活動,
購買 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版) 自己可以選擇是否要使用7-11取書(貨)服務,亦或是選擇使用宅配到府服務，真的很方便！
底下是 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版) 的內容簡介
以歷史悠久的Netter’s圖解為架構，是您在言語、語言和聽覺等領域所必備之圖譜!
以Frank Netter博士所著世界一流的圖解為主軸，輔以解剖學和生理學上關於言語、語言和聽覺（SLH）的必要資訊，Netter’s 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜將是您重要的SLH參考文獻。以圖像與文字相互對照的方式，輕鬆串連解剖、生理觀念及詳細的圖解內容。Netter’s 以解剖組織系統概論，以及對正常言語、吞嚥和聽覺之解剖和功能基礎的聚焦討論，為SLH提供了紮實的基礎。
您亦將發現這些令人興奮的特色：
．Frank Netter的醫學圖解及簡單易懂的敘述清楚呈現關於言語、語言和聽覺的解剖與生理學資訊，協助您輕鬆建立診斷和治療疾病所需的知識基礎。
．藉由圖文對照的編排方式，以圖譜形式同時提供您所需之視覺與文字資訊。
．整合呼吸、發音、關節、聽覺和神經等五個系統，使本書切合臨床和課堂所需。
．每一章節的系統肌肉概要表以快速、容易且前後一致的格式，為學習和參考呈現重要資訊。
譯者簡介
蔡怡汝
輔仁大學醫學系副教授
陳淑華
台北醫學大學助理教授
- 作者： David H. McFarland
已追蹤作者：[修改]
確定
取消
新功能介紹 - 譯者： 蔡怡汝、陳淑華
- 出版社：台灣愛思唯爾
新功能介紹 - 出版日期：2013/01/01
- 語言：繁體中文
商品網址: 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第二版)
商品網址: 言語、吞嚥及聽覺解剖學圖譜(第博客來二版)
2017-10-29 03:00
TWO SIDES: The Taiwan LGBT Pride Community used the gathering to promote sex education, while others derided the DPP for stalling on gay marriage legislation
By Lin Chia-nan / Staff reporter
The 15th annual Taipei lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender （LGBT） Pride Parade yesterday drew about 123,000 participants, according to organizers’ estimates, hitting a new record since it was first held in 2003.
At about 1pm yesterday, paraders flooded toward the event’s main stage on Ketagalan Boulevard with 160 attending groups — including the American Institute in Taiwan and 12 groups from Japan and South Korea — divided into nine groups marching along three different routes.
The western route proceeded on Gongyuan Road （公園路）, the northern on Zhongshan S Road （中山南路） and the southern on Xinyi Road （信義路）.
After a two-hour parade from 2:30pm to 4:30pm, revelers returned to the boulevard for musical performances and group speeches until about 7:30pm.
Event organizer Taiwan LGBT Pride Community used the event to promote sex education, saying students should have access to diversified education about different sexual orientations and gender differences.
When people are familiar with different sexual orientations across the spectrum, they will be less likely to discriminate against others who are different from themselves, Taiwan Gender Equity Education Association spokesperson Chuang Shu-ching （莊淑靜） said.
The Council of Grand Justices on May 24 announced its constitutional interpretation of the Civil Code, saying that it is unconstitutional to deny same-sex couples the right to marry and called on lawmakers to amend the code within two years.
The two-year period can be painfully long for many same-sex couples, Green Party Taiwan member Jia Bo-kai （賈伯楷） said, adding that some of his friends have passed away before winning the right to be married.
The Democratic Progressive Party （DPP） is deferring marriage equality legislation because it wants to cater to both supporting and opposition camps, Jia said.
“The DPP does not even have the ability to ‘harvest’ the issue even though the council has paved the way,” he said.
Marriage Equality Platform spokesperson Jennifer Lu （呂欣潔） called on the government to speed up same-sex marriage legislation, adding that the equality of all citizens should come before what the opposition groups call “solidarity.”
Marta Bulawa, a 23-year-old Polish woman joining the parade for the first time with her European friends, said marriage means “security” for gay people.
Loren Letourneau, a 37-year-old Canadian with two children, said sexual orientation is not a choice, but a natural disposition, and he would teach his children to be safe no matter their sexual orientation.
At 4pm yesterday, Premier William Lai （賴清德） wrote on Facebook that the Executive Yuan would follow the constitutional interpretation to propose a bill about same-sex marriage soon.
Meanwhile, both the Happiness of the Next Generation Alliance （Happiness Alliance） and the Alliance of Taiwan Religious Groups for the Protection of the Family （Family Alliance） issued statements in response to the parade’s call for wider sex education.
Gay rights advocates often reduce sex education to merely sexual acts, while students should be protected from such an “improper sex education,” the Happiness Alliance said.
Same-sex marriage advocates have distorted school education by instilling wrong information into students, adding that gay people should not be involved in sex education, the Family Alliance said.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
E3E6E9F99FFCCE13
文章標籤
全站熱搜
